[Part 4] How President Putin explained the reasons for "Ukraine invasion" to the people: 1 hour speech translation
The translator himself is no longer understood when it will end, which is the fourth speech by President Putin, the fourth time.
It is a problem that cannot be connected to the official English version of Kremlin, but I was informed from Japan that it would not be connected.I didn't seem to have been noticed, so I was relieved (maybe anonymous cyber attack?
Before I knew that, I was scared and lost my computer cookies and others.Thanks to that, it's all re -driving (I have only a bitter smile).
I think those who are playing anti -war in Russia are really courageous.
Personally, this time, it is a completely different sense and a content that makes me think.
============
<3>
The United States and NATO have begun to develop the Ukrainian territory as a potential stage of military operations.The joint exercise that is held regularly is obviously anti -Russia.Last year alone, more than 23,000 soldiers and more than 1,000 units are involved.
In 2022, a law has already been established to allow foreign troops to come to Ukraine to participate in multinational exercises.Of course, these are mainly NATO troops.This year, at least 10 joint exercises are planned.
Obviously, these are designed in Ukraine territory to provide a covered cover for the NATO Group to be rapidly enhanced.
In particular, we quote only a few, such as Bolice Poli (near Kiev), Iwano Frankifusk (Southwest), Tygue (Eastern (famous as the Soviet Union), Odessa (west coast of the Black Sea), etc.Modernized airfield networks can move troops in a very short time.
Ukraine's airspace is open to US strategic aircraft, reconnaissance aircraft, and drone flights that monitor Russian territory.
In addition, the U.S. Maritime Operation Center, built in Ochakov, has to support Russian Black Sea fleets and all infrastructure along the Black Sea coast to support NATO warship activities, including precision weapons.
At one point, the United States intended to build a similar facility in Crimea, but the Crimeans and the Sevastopoli people failed the plan.We always remember that.
Today, I would like to repeat such centers that they are already deployed in Ochakov.In the 18th century, Alexander Svolov soldiers fought for the city.Thanks to their courage, this city was incorporated into Russia.
In the 18th century, it was named Novolosia (New Russia) on the Black Sea coast of Russia in a war with the Ottoman Empire.
Today, these historical events and the name of the Russian Empire's nations and the greats of the soldiers are also trying to forget it.Without their efforts, modern Ukraine would not have even accessed the Black Sea.
Recently, Alexander Svolov's monument has been demolished in Portaba.What do you mean.Do you abandon your past?Is it a so -called colonial heritage of the Russian Empire?In that case, keep it consistent.
Second, Article 17 of the Ukrainian Constitution stipulates that the deployment of foreign military bases on the territory is illegal.However, it turned out that this was just an easy -to -avoid regulations.
Ukraine has a NATO training strategy (mission), effectively a foreign army base.I just called the base a strategy and ended it.
Kiev has long evoked NATO member as a strategic path.Certainly, each country has the right to select a security system in its country and to form a military alliance.
Without "but" it would have no problem.International documents clearly stipulate the principles of equal and inseparable security.This includes damage to other countries' security and not to strengthen their own security.
This principle is specified in the Charter of the OSCE (European Security Cooperation Agency) adopted in Istanbul in 1999, and the 2010 OSCE Astana Declaration.
In other words, choosing a path to security should not be a threat to other countries, but Ukrainian NATO is a direct threat to Russia's security.
Remember that the NATO Summit held in the Romanian capital of Bucharest in April 2008 has adopted the decision that Ukraine and Georgia will become NATO member countries.
Many European allies have already noticed the risks of this prospect, but they had to succumb to their partner's principles.Americans only used them to pursue obvious anti -Russian policies.
A certain number in NATO member states is still very skeptical about Ukrainian NATO.I have received signals from some European capitals to avoid it because it doesn't happen overnight.
In fact, our American partners say the same.We understand, if it doesn't happen tomorrow, it will happen the day after tomorrow.Is there any difference in this historically?There is nothing at all.
Furthermore, it is aware that the thriving hostility in eastern Ukraine is an American leader, saying that if the country meets the NATO standard and overcome rot, it will not eliminate the possibility of member of NATO.I am.
Meanwhile, they try to convince us over and over again that NATO is a peaceful and purely protective alliance that NATO is not a threat.Once again, we want us to believe those words.
But we know the real value of these words well.In 1990, when the unification of Germany was discussed, the United States did not expand to the Soviet leadership, NATO's jurisdiction and military presentation, even east, and the unification of Germany was the east of NATO's military organization.We promised not to expand to to.This is a quote.
They gave a lot of mouth guarantees, but they were all empty phrases.After that, they will improve their relationship with Moscow, relieve the fears rooted in the bitter historical heritage of these countries, and also create a Russian friendship belt.That was the case.
However, what happened was the opposite.Some Eastern European governments have Russian phobia, brought prejudice and stereotypes on the Russian threats to the alliance, strengthened the potential of collective defense, and deploy them mainly to Russia.I claimed that.
Even worse, it happened in the 1990s and early 2000s.Thanks to our openness and good intentions, the relationship between Russia and the west has reached a high level.
Russia has fulfilled all obligations, including the withdrawal from Germany and Central East Europe, and has made a major contribution to overcoming the Cold War heritage.We have consistently provided various options for cooperation, including the NATO Russian Board of Directors and the OSCE framework.
Furthermore, let's say something I have never said.I will say it for the first time now.Later, when President Bill Clinton, the current position in the United States, visited Moscow in 2000, I asked him what the United States thinks about Russia's NATO.
I don't know all the details of this conversation, but the reaction to my questions is extremely modest, and the true attitude of Americans in this possibility is actually taken to Japan.It is actually revealed.
See the northern Caucasus terrorists, explicit support, Japan's security demands, ignoring concerns, continuous expansion of NATO, and withdrawal from the Treaty of Bullet Observatory (ABM Treaty).These ask questions.why?
There is only one answer.It is not our political system or other things.It simply doesn't just need an independent power like Russia.That is the answer to all questions.This is the source of American traditional anti -stew policy, which is also an attitude toward all security proposals.
